Share this Article

Court Settlement Teaches Mortgage Caveats

Written by on Thursday, 27 January 2000 6:00 pm
 PRINT  |   EMAIL

SAN JOSE, CA -- There's a hard and time-worn lesson to be learned from a recent court settlement with an Irvine, CA-based mortgage company charged with failing to disclose excessive fees.

"If it appears too good to be true, it probably is," said This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , legal counsel for more than a half dozen California homeowners who say they are victims of predatory lending practices from the same company.

In one suit, one day after opening arguments in the case's Santa Clara County Superior Court jury trial last week, Irvine, CA-based First Alliance Mortgage Corp. and Fresno, CA home owner Joanne Pagter settled with a confidential agreement.

Joanne Pagter and her husband, Edward, filed suit four years ago claiming First Alliance hid from them refinanced mortgage terms that amounted to more than $20,000. In 1996 Edward Pagter was terminally ill with renal disease, and the couple wanted to lower their monthly mortgage payments to help prepare for retirement.

Edward Pagter died last year.

First Alliance, a public Delaware corporation traded as FACO on the NASDAQ stock exchange, denied wrongdoing and said the couple should have reviewed the terms of the mortgage closely and had three days to cancel the loan within three days after signing it.

More outstanding suits

The company also denied wrongdoing when it settled for $6.85 million in a class action suit filed in Alameda County in 1989 for similar truth-in-lending violation allegations.

Last year, First Alliance also agreed to pay $4,000 to each of approximately 150 borrowers with similar claims. The mortgage lender said it's ready to settle in other cases, including two more in San Jose due for trial in April.

Still more cases against First Alliance are outstanding in Illinois, Massachusetts and California.

In California, the American Association of Retired People joined another suit brought in 1995 by Hofmann's Steinbock & Hofmann law firm to stop First Alliance from engaging in what the AARP says are unfair and deceptive practices, including hiding rates and terms of loans from borrowers.

Such practices are of special concern in California and other fast-appreciating areas where a booming housing market has spawned sudden equity riches.

The AARP-Hofmann suit's plaintiffs include older, retired couples, but the plaintiffs are primarily single women, 55 and older -- vulnerable consumers First Alliance targets, the suit alleges.

Generally, the suits say First Alliance allegedly:

  • Misrepresented loan origination fees to be less than the actual amount.

  • Misrepresented as "free" an initial no-payment period of one to several months. First Alliance told borrowers they didn't have to make payments for a month or more but the payments were actually financed with the rest of the mortgage, effectively granting advance mortgage payments to First Alliance, the suit alleges.

  • Misrepresented interest rates as low, without disclosing they were teaser adjustable rates that within years could swell beyond what the borrower could afford and beyond going market rates the borrowers could likely land.

    "From the experience that others have suffered, people should learn to exercise caution, particularly when you are refinancing. That's where the process works to hide the cost of the loan," said Hofmann.

    Predatory lending practices

    Norma Paz Garcia, an attorney with Consumers Union and author of "The Hard Sell: Combating Home Lending Fraud in California," said lenders also use several common practices to sell high-cost home-equity and refinanced loans to homeowners, regardless of their ability to repay the loan

  • Lenders make loans in conjunction with home improvements that often never materialize.

  • They sell loans under the guise of "rescuing" homeowners from foreclosure, when merely saddling owners with more debt.

  • They offer high-interest, disaster-related home loans.

  • They consolidate debt into unaffordable home-equity loans, again under a guise, "making life easier."

    Garcia said much of the problem is related to lenders able to charge what they please. In most states, there are no limits on the points and fees lenders can charge.

    Against sweeping legislation that would strip consumers' bargaining power, Jack Guttentag, the "The Mortgage Professor", says some of the blame is with consumers.

    "Borrowers pay mortgage brokers an average $1,500 to $2,000 -- about what it costs to paint a modest sized house. But consumers wouldn't dream of hiring a house painter without the price in advance and in writing," he said.

    "States should require that mortgage brokers operate the same way other businesses must in a market economy. Brokers should be forced to quote the price for their service and not be allowed to conceal it until the transaction is completed," he added.

    Avoiding predatory lenders

    Consumers Union teaches consumers how to spot come-ons, also offers tips to help protect you against predatory lending practices.

  • Before you start looking for an equity loan (including those for reverse mortgages, bill consolidation or to stave off foreclosure) or home improvement loan, get free, independent loan counseling from your city or county's housing department, community or social group, credit counseling service or recognized consumer advocacy agency.

  • Avoid door-to-door and direct-mail pitches for home-equity loans and loans connected to unsolicited home improvement contracts. Instead, get referrals from family members, friends, co-workers and others you trust.

  • Avoid loans with interest rates high above market averages. Shop around to compare the going market rates among savings and loans, banks, mortgage lenders and brokers.

    "The Internet makes this very easy today," says Hofmann.

  • Avoid come-ons that begin "No credit? No job? No problem! Don't worry. You have plenty of equity in your home to qualify for a loan." What really "qualifies" you for the loan with a disreputable company is your inability to pay it. When you fail to meet payments, they can legally take your home.

  • Avoid interest-only, non-amortizing or partially amortizing loans. After you make years of payments you will still owe the money you borrowed, often as one large "balloon" payment at the end of the contract's term.

  • Avoid loans based solely on your equity, rather than your ability to repay.

  • Don't apply to lenders or brokers who require a high, non-refundable application fee.

  • Never allow yourself to be pressured into signing a contract unless you've read and understand every word. If the offer is good today, it should be good tomorrow. Likewise, don't sign anything with blank spaces. They could be filled in later with an amount you wouldn't agree to.

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission offers an on-line complaint form to report mortgage fraud and questionable practices.

    Also See:

  • Lender Secret Now Leaking Out
  • Loan Modification Secrets Uncovered
  • Rate this item
    (0 votes)

      About the author, Broderick Perkins

    Individual news stories are based upon the opinions of the writer and does not reflect the opinion of Realty Times.
    Start Growing Loyal Leads!