| July 12, 2006 |
|
California's home inspection industry has been busy lately busting myths about home inspections because consumers too often hold misguided beliefs about the service. Errant thoughts about when a home inspection is necessary, who should perform it and how it should be conducted, can lead to hazardous conditions left undiscovered and undisclosed, litigation and deals gone sour -- all of which can cost big bucks. A professional home inspection gives a home the once over from the foundation to the rafters and generates a report that details the condition of a home's major components. Inspectors don't rip into walls, take apart appliances or dive into the swimming pool, but virtually anything you can see, a professional home inspector can inspect with a trained eye. Here are the myths and the facts that dispel them, according to the California Real Estate Inspectors Association (CREIA) and other sources. Myth: An inspection isn't needed as long as a qualified person tells you the condition of the property.
Myth: A termite inspection is all you need to know about a home you're buying.
Myth: You only need a general contractor to do a home inspection.
Myth: An inspection report is a seller's repair list.
Myth: A home sold "as-is" does not need an inspection.
Myth: New homes don't need inspections.
Two years ago, Consumer Reports' "Housewrecked," based on scores of interviews with home owners, builders, inspectors, industry representatives, government officials, and lawyers, reported that as many as 15 percent of all new homes sold -- 150,000 of them a year nationwide -- had a serious defect. This summer, indicating new home quality has worsened since then, Quality Built, a risk management services firm from San Diego, CA, reported on data collected on 20,867 single-family and 11,128 multi-family homes by hands-on independent inspectors trained to identify high-risk construction defects. Quality found that 41 percent of the homes examined in 27 states, constructed by more than 900 different builders, revealed building envelope problems, a potential moisture intrusion and mold problem; 34 percent had framing and structural problems, including missing connections, a potentially deadly condition in rough weather or during earthquakes. Homes in western states were of higher quality than those elsewhere, but the study was a big myth buster. New homes often are far from perfect. Unfortunately, builders often won't let you hire a private inspector to inspect the home, during the phases of a home's construction, at several times when inspectors say such an inspection would be most beneficial. Builders argue consumers have no rights to the property until they sign on the dotted line; that they (builders) could be liable if you or your inspector is injured on the job site and, in one argument that's holding less and less water -- municipal inspectors and builder-hired third-party inspectors are doing their job. Home inspector trade groups are attempting to work with builders to get beyond the construction zone gates with specialists trained in new home inspections to perform "in-progress" inspections. Once a home is built, many conditions can become hidden, insidious defects that won't show up until you need the home to perform at its best. For that reason, whenever possible, a buyer's representative should inspect a new home as it is being built, so any defects can be corrected before the home becomes the kind of house of cards Quality Built turned up far too often. |
With an award winning staff of writers providing up to the minute real estate news and advice, thousands of REALTORS® in North America reporting daily market conditions, and a nationally broadcast television news program, Realty Times is the one-stop shop for real estate information. That's why over 10,000 real estate professionals have turned to us for their publicity needs.