![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
July 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Should Unlicensed Inspectors Be Allowed To Do Mold Inspections?
by Blanche Evans
It's an interesting hole in state regulations. All states require licensure to sell real estate, but few require a license to build homes or to inspect homes. Home inspectors aren't licensed at all in almost half of the U.S. because the states don't have the revenues or manpower to police them. In fact, some home inspectors can make a mistake on their inspections, and not be held any more liable than the cost of a $200 or $300 inspection to the consumer, even though the mistake could generate thousands of dollars in problems. Lora Fossler is trying to sell her home in Broward County, Florida. The buyer requested a mold test of the home inspector, which he performed by sampling the air. The test showed mold, and the buyer walked. "As the homeowners of this house, we were shocked," says Fossler. "We have never had any intrusion of water or flood. I wanted to know where this mold was and how to eradicate it. I began by hiring a certified environmentalist. Over a two-day period and two inspectors inspecting the wall cavities, the attic, roof, bathrooms, HVAC (air-conditioning) system and collecting pertinent data samples including air samples, relative humidity readings, and CO2 levels, the results showed no evidence of mold in this house." Fossler continues, "The home inspector did not collect any of this data -- only a minuscule amount of air sampling inside and outside the home. I did not witness the home inspector collecting the outside air sampling, but I did witness the inside air sampling. At the time the home inspector was collecting his sample, the contracted buyer and their children had left the back sliding door open so the parents could be inside and tend to their children playing outside. Clearly intrusion of outside air was concentrated with indoor air." Here's the problem for Fossler. Florida doesn't license or register home inspectors, and neither do 26 other states. Further, mold inspections aren't required by any state, nor is there any recognized standard procedure for testing for mold. There isn't even a requirement by the county that homes be tested for mold. Yet, state mandates require that homeowners disclose all facts that may materially or adversely affect the value of the home to the buyer, including the results of a test that isn't required or regulated by the state. According to the American Society Of Home Inspectors (ASHI) assistant executive director Jim Jones, mold is almost always an ancillary inspection product. "It's not covered in our standards of practice," says Jones, "and I don't know of any states that require mold inspection as part of home inspections or any that require an air quality inspection." According to state law, Fossler must disclose the results of the buyers' test for mold. "I have already lost one sale because a home inspection service," says Fossler, "which is not a certified mold inspector, had reported this house had mold. Another prospective buyer on their third visit to the house asked me about the mold issue. Skeptical over the conflicting reports, the couple decided not to buy." Fossler says that now her home has been stigmatized, and she is having an attorney look into the matter. How can the state require disclosure of a test that isn't required, isn't standard, and is performed by unlicensed, unregulated personnel? Find out in tomorrow's Agent News what Fossler and her attorney are doing to get the stigma of mold removed from her home. Published: September 24, 2003 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||