![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
May 16, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
by Peter Miller
Pre-Approval Versus Pre-Qualification: Is There A
Difference?
Peter G. Miller
What's the difference between someone who is "pre-approved" for a loan and
someone who is "pre-qualified?" Is one better than the other? And if so, how?
These questions arose from a letter I received and seemed worth pursuing --
after all, if one approach is better than the other, wouldn't that be helpful
to borrowers?
In general terms, the idea behind pre-qualifying is this: You're a home buyer.
You do not have enough money to buy for cash (do not be distressed, this makes
you absolutely normal). The result: Your ability to buy depends on your ability
to borrow, so it makes sense to speak with lenders before looking at houses to
check your mortgage power and consider which loan program might be best for you.
So, lender Jones offers to "pre-qualify" you while Lender Smith has a
"pre-approval" program. Which is better? Is there an a single definition for
each term or an objective difference between them?
I asked a number of real estate folks about this and the results were
interesting: There seemed to be three general areas of agreement:
If a pre-approval or pre-qualification is less than a full loan commitment, why
should buyers bother? Here's why:
By speaking with a lender you can get an informed idea of how much you can
afford, which homes are in your price range, and which loan programs might be
best for you. This is important information
On the basis of your meeting, the lender can provide a "pre-approval" or
"pre-qualification" letter suggesting in broad terms that you can likely
qualify for "x" financing dollars.
There will be a caveat saying that the letter does not represent an actual loan
commitment because the lender reserves the right to review the appraisal,
verify credit and employment information, and take such other steps as it feels
are necessary to reduce risk. Because they are less than absolute loan
commitments, such missives are often called "hand-holding" letters.
By pre-qualifying or getting pre-approved you demonstrate to brokers and
sellers that you're serious and that you have a good idea of what you can
afford. For sellers, an offer from someone who has pre-qualified or sought
pre-approval is to be preferred over an offer from someone who has never met
with a lender and thus has little idea of what might or might not be affordable.
For additional information, speak with local brokers and lenders. As well, here
are three good books that can help you in the marketplace:
Q We have just moved into a new
development and in speaking with our neighbors were shocked to find out that
their closing costs were several thousand dollars lower than our expenses. How
did they get a better deal?
A The difference in closing costs
may be surprising, but it may also be reasonable. In fact, it's entirely
possible that your neighbors did not get a "better" deal, only a different one.
For example, suppose you have a loan with 1 point and your neighbor has a loan
of the same size and no points -- but a higher rate. Your closing costs would
be steeper, but your monthly expense would be lower.
Or, it could be that your neighbor negotiated a deal which required the builder
to pay more closing costs than you were able to extract -- but maybe you got
other benefits (that better rec room or perhaps those nicer kitchen cabinets).
You're right to ask about the difference in closing costs, but you must also
look at how the properties compare and the overall features of each transaction
before concluding that one deal was better than another.
Every few years a newspaper invests enormous sums of both money and commitment
and allows one or more reporters to investigate a complex subject. The efforts
of The Washington
Post during the Watergate affair are a classic example, and now we have a
two-year study from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette looking into the judicial system and
finding that, "hundreds of times during the past 10 years, federal agents and
prosecutors have pursued justice by breaking the law. They lied, hid evidence,
distorted facts, engaged in cover-ups, paid for perjury and set up innocent
people in a relentless effort to win indictments, guilty pleas and convictions."
This 10-part series, "Win At All Costs," is an obvious candidate for the
Pulitzer prize and material well worth reading.
Published: December 8, 1998 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles: Editor's Note: This article reflects the opinions of Peter Miller only and not necessarily the views of this or any other publication, organization or Website owner.
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 6.01% 15 Year Fixed: 5.60% 1 Year Adj: 5.18% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||