![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
November 13, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
by Peter G. Miller
Peter G. Miller
Could a small number of computer-adept agents replace most of today's real
estate pros? Instead of perhaps 1 million active brokers and salespeople, could
most realty transactions be handled by a small battalion of super-efficient
licensees?
This sure sounds enticing, unless you're a consumer who would like the widest
possible selection of brokers. Or one of the real estate licensees who is not
among the efficiency elite.
But not to worry. Logic and reality suggest that even with the Internet large
numbers of brokers will be needed far into the future.
In 1998 there were 4,970,000 existing home transactions as well as 886,000 new
home sales, a total of 5,856,000 property transfers. Let's also assume that
each transaction represents two "sides" -- one for a buyer and one for a seller
-- but that in half of all deals a single broker handles the entire
arrangement, or both sides of the deal. In essence, we multiply 5,856,000 x 1.5
and determine that in 1998 there were 8,784,000 brokerage opportunities.
If 1 million agents handle such work, then each would have about 8.78 closings
per year. But look what happens when we reduce the number of agents:
Will the web so change real estate that an elite battalion of super agents, say
75,000 or 50,000, will be able to handle most transactions?
If the answer is "yes" we ought to consider the implications.
What level of services will be available to consumers from brokers handling one
transaction every two days, or one transaction per day?
Will brokers reduce the range of services they offer to handle a large number
of transactions? If yes, how is this different than the menu-of-service firms
which are now active in most markets?
If super agents offer fewer services, will their income per transaction rise or
fall?
What happens if a local home market slows? Can super agents in a stagnant
market survive if they offer fewer services and earn less per transaction?
If brokers are doing more work without gaining additional income, what's the
point?
A really good broker with a number of licensed assistants may well be able to
handle a large business volume. But in such situations what we usually have is
more than one person handling the transactions.
Every local market has mega-agents and brokers. I re-call one agent who in a
single year handled 230 transactions worth $42 million in residential listings
-- with a staff of nine.
How did this one agent generate so much volume?
First, he was very good at what he did.
Second, he was a marketing whiz, sending out some 80,000 letters per month.
Third, he was well-organized.
Could computing and the Internet create other mega-agents?
Surely there will be cases where the Web allows a small number of licensees to
reach super-agent status. But a more likely result is that the old 80/20 split
will evolve.
For years in real estate the oft-quoted "rule" has been that 20 percent of all
active licensees handle 80 percent of all the business. But what we're seeing
now is that with the web a number of computer-savvy agents are pulling ahead of
their peers. Perhaps the new "rule" will be 85/15 or even 90/10.
Evidence to support such thinking can be found in the 1999 member study just
released by the National Association of
Realtors.
Nearly nine out of ten Realtors own or lease a computer, according the report,
and 62 percent surveyed said they use e-mail and the Internet for business
purposes. Nearly three out of ten individual members have a Web page (74
percent said their company has a Web page), and 57 percent report at least 1
percent of their business is generated from on-line services.
What does it all mean? Professionals who use a computer earned $22,600 more
than competitors who do not, according to the survey. This is big money when
you consider that in 1998 the median gross income for a broker was $63,100,
while the typical real estate agent earned $30,300.
The Internet presents new marketing and communication opportunities, and many
brokers have shown that they can be effective on the Web. They have also shown
something else: predictions that the Internet would replace or devalue most
brokers have been wrong.
Question Of The Week
Q Does the new FHA homeowners protection program
cover conventional loans?
A No. The FHA program -- which assigns new tasks and
responsibilities to appraisers and encourages the use of home inspectors --
does not apply to either conventional loans or VA financing.
Alternatively, buyers as a matter of course, should make the purchase of a home
contingent on a home inspection "satisfactory" to them by the individual or
company of their choice. If the inspection is not "satisfactory," then the deal
is off and the buyer's deposit should be refunded in full.
For proper language and advice, please speak with a broker or attorney.
Weekly Resource
Need a great quote or clever observation? Try Aphorisms Galore. You can search the
site by author and topic to quickly find just the right words.
Published: July 27, 1999 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles: Editor's Note: This article reflects the opinions of Peter G. Miller only and not necessarily the views of this or any other publication, organization or Website owner.
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 4.98% 15 Year Fixed: 4.40% 1 Year Adj: 4.47% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||