 Real Estate News and Advice |
| May 25, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
by Peter G. Miller
Peter G. Miller
If it were possible, there's little doubt that we would each opt for immortality, vitality, and endless good health if such choices were available. We would most likely agree with Clarence Darrow, the defense attorney at the Scopes trial, who once explained that "I shall no doubt act as others do at the last moment of my existence. With my last breath I shall probably try to draw another."
Alas, even when it's possible to avoid accidents and illness, the human body eventually declines -- a stark and discomforting reality that's best faced sooner rather than later.
Over a lifetime we each acquire various goods, some with value only to ourselves, some with sentimental value to others, and some -- such as real estate -- with material value. We would not normally allow such goods to be taken from us in life, why then should we allow that to happen in the event of disability or death?
In our society either you make your wishes known through the use of a will or you die "intestate" and allow a state government to use its best judgment in such matters. Since state rules vary -- and given that even with the best intentions state officials have no possible knowledge of your penchants and preferences -- without a will assets earned over a lifetime will likely be distributed in a way that would you would never elect.
The only option that makes sense is to plan ahead, but such planning forces us to recognize that we are each vulnerable and mortal. These are discomforting notions, and yet it's important to speak with an attorney and tax professional regarding such matters, and it's important to do it now.
You need a will so that your wishes at death can be honored, and you need a living will so that only medical care you regard as appropriate will be undertaken. But in practice, however, it's not enough to have a will or living will. You must tell folks that such documents exist and where they can be found.
What else can you do?
Long ago, when my wife and I married, my attorney and his wife gave us two gifts: There was beautiful kitchenware which we use each day, and there was a will and living will separately for my wife and I. Of all the gifts we received, none has had greater value than the certainty of knowing our wishes will be fulfilled in the event of death or disability.
I'm aware that wills and such are difficult and discomforting subjects to consider. But having just combed through an astonishing volume of files, folders, and documents in an effort to determine the wishes and preferences of a loved one, I have no doubt that pre-planning is the best way to assure that your desires are known and respected.
The Common-Sense Mortgage
The latest edition of The Common-Sense Mortgage is now available in bookstores online and off. In print for nearly 15 years and widely recognized as the standard consumer guide to real estate financing, previous editions have been described as "virtually in a class by itself" (The Philadephia Inquirer) and as "one of the best available guidebooks to the realty financing jungle," (The Los Angeles Times).
Whether financing or re-financing, whether you're a borrower, broker, or loan officer, this money saving, easy-to-read and well-organized guide is a necessity for anyone in the real estate marketplace. For additional information, press here.
Question Of The Week
Q: I want to buy a single-family property now financed with an FHA loan for use as a rental. My broker says new financing will be needed. This seems unfair. How come?
A: FHA 203(b) loans -- the most popular form of FHA financing -- cannot be assumed by investors if originated after December 15, 1989.
It's argued that investors represent more risk than owner-occupants and thus should not be allowed to assume FHA loans. Alternatively, if FHA financing were assumable by investors, say loans at least two years old, then the pool of potential buyers would expand and there would be more demand for properties financed with FHA mortgages. The result might be bigger profits for FHA buyers, something which would make the program more interesting to borrowers.
Weekly Resource
There's always a need for sites that explain web page design and layout in terms that everyone can understand. Tips, Tricks, How-To, and Beyond has a nice way of illustrating HTML construction.
Also See:
Published: November 30, 1999 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws.
Editor's Note: This article reflects the opinions of Peter G. Miller only and not necessarily the views of this or any other publication, organization or Website owner. |
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.83% 15 Year Fixed: 3.05% 1 Year Adj: 2.73% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 11/30/1999 12:00:00 AM
 Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Will Is The Way To Preserve Property