![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
October 15, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Curbing Telemarketers' House Calls
by Broderick Perkins
The non-profit consumer advocacy agency says laws protecting consumers from harassing and unscrupulous telemarketing practices need strengthening. Telemarketing fraud costs consumers $40 billion each year, and typically preys on older residents who are often home bound. With more information available to telemarketers through weak privacy laws, the Internet and new data mining techniques, consumers need more protection than ever. Current laws just don't go far enough protecting people from the two biggest telemarketing problems -- fraud and frequency. "You have two kinds of problems in telemarketing, the pests and the predators," said Reggie James, director of CU's Southwest Regional Office in Austin, TX. CU says curbing both requires law to make it easier for consumers to get on no-call lists. In Texas, for instance, the laws says residents must notify each solicitor individually to be placed on a no-call list and telephone solicitors must make only "every effort" to avoid calling consumers who request not to be called. James wants a statewide Texas no-call list and the process simplified. He suggests legislators draft laws that require a page in the phone book for consumers to fill out and mail in to be placed on a no-call list. Along with the page, there should be information on consumers' rights including current laws and regulations. Not only would that help consumers avoid the pests, but it would also help consumers recognize the predators. "Right now there are a lot of loopholes and many companies are not registered," James said. "I'd like to see some of those loopholes closed." Companies selling insurance and food, for instance, don't have to register as telemarketers in Texas. Once a company is registered, CU believes it should be required to identify itself immediately in the call. Companies should also give their phone number and tell exactly what they're selling and how much it will cost. This gives consumers the chance to verify the validity of a company before buying anything and they will know exactly what they are purchasing and how much it costs. Consumers Union also wants stiffer penalties for those who violate the laws. "The only way to enforce the laws is to make the penalties for fraud as stiff as possible and put more power for enforcement into the consumers' hands," said James. Strengthening the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) to allow consumers to sue for attorneys fees and a refund when faced with telemarketing fraud would create the kind of unfriendly atmosphere that would deter fraudulent activities without a large regulatory force, he said. "You have to make it easy for consumers to avoid the calls they don't want and simplify the legal process when they are wronged or harmed." James said. Published: June 22, 2000 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 5.94% 15 Year Fixed: 5.63% 1 Year Adj: 5.15% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||