![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| February 10, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Online Versus Traditional Brokerages: Is Blending Best?
by Ed Krafchow
It’s no secret that online home services are going out as fast as they popped onto the scene. Many are suffering significant losses, restructuring, or fighting an uphill battle with cost versus revenue models that are tough to support over the long haul. Why, with this abundance of online options, are consumers still preferring traditional brokerages? How can the traditional model reinvent itself to stay afloat long term as more online competitors continues to challenge its business model? Where is the industry headed, and who will emerge as the “preferred provider” of real estate services and what form will that model take? These are the questions I, and just about every other broker, on and off line, should be asking. According to industry experts, many of the online business models were inherently flawed, while others, though the numbers made sense on paper, have not garnered much support from consumers. And caught in the center of this controversy is the agent/client relationship. It is becoming evident that that consumers are not ready or willing to walk through the maze of buying or selling a home without professional assistance, and agents are not about to roll over and give up their livelihood to a mouse. Thus, the playing field is becoming a much more grounded in a blend between the traditional and online options. There’s no doubt that the consumer is demanding faster, more efficient processes from agents and brokers, and greater control of information. This has caused proactive brokerages to invest in technology to accommodate growing expectations from both agents and their clients. Prudential California Realty (PCR) has already invested heavily in the technology that allows agents to excel, with more than $3 million in technology advances in 2000 alone. Advances that have been particularly useful include:
We have found these advances have made a huge difference in agent productivity, because let’s face it, a top producing agent actually spends very little time tethered to an office. And because the Bay Area allows us to pilot these advances with some of the most technically savvy consumers on the planet, we’ve got an excellent hand on the pulse of the market, and will continue to think ahead and stay ahead. Published: March 13, 2001 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles: |
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines 03/13/2001
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||