![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
November 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lending Abuses Overstated, Claim Industry Advocates
by Lew Sichelman
With more than 30 state and local governments entertaining legislation to combat abusive lending practices -- not to mention several different proposals floating around Capital Hill in Washington -- it's no wonder the mortgage industry feels persecuted. Of course, some of the heat is well deserved. After all, more than a few unsuspecting borrowers have lost their homes at the hands of predatory lenders or paid fees and rates that are clearly exorbitant. There are other ways home owners have been taken, too. But industry officials continue to maintain the accusations of widespread abuses are over-exaggerated. "It's happening," admits Wright Andrews, the chief lobbyist for the National Home Equity Lenders Association, "but not nearly as much as people say." One of the charges that has surfaced of late is that unscrupulous lenders have targeted minorities. But Andrews says government data proves that's just not so. In fact, he says, it shows that the racial and ethnic mix of subprime lending is weighted more heavily towards whites than the general population. Subprime is the industry term for loans made to borrowers with less than sterling credit records. It's not the same thing as predatory lending, the lobbyist admits. Nevertheless, he says that information collected under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act is proof positive there is no link between abusive practices and discrimination. More than three out of every four subprime loans went to whites in 1988, according to HMDA data, while just 14 percent went to African Americans, only 7 percent went to Hispanics and a mere 3 percent went to Asians. By comparison, the U.S. population that year was 72 percent white, 13 percent Black, 10 percent Hispanic and 3 percent Asian. Meanwhile, the Mortgage Bankers Association, which has maintained that the best way to prevent abusive practices is to enforce current laws, not enact new ones, will soon publish a compendium of federal, state and local laws that are already on the books and can be used to curb abuses. The MBA expects the tome to be "a very valuable tool" in helping its members beat back the rising tide of state and local legislation, which, if enacted, will become an operational nightmare for multi-market lenders. "We want to see more enforcement," Howard Glaser, says the MBA's chief lobbyist. "Nobody should be ahead of us on that. But making predatory practices illegal-er won't help." In place of new legislation to protect consumers, the MBA and other mortgage interests are hoping to persuade lawmakers in Washington to simplify a process that Glaser called "a breeding ground for abuse" by allowing lenders to provide loan applicants with an up-front closing price guarantee. "You can't beat something with nothing; you've got to have an alternative," he said. The idea is that federal law would supersede anything state and local governments can throw at lenders. But even though there is some support for comprehensive mortgage reform among moderate Democrats and growing interest in the topic by new HUD Secretary Mel Martinez, few observers are holding out much hope for passage, at least this year. For more articles by Lew Sichelman, please press here. Published: April 30, 2001 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 6.04% 15 Year Fixed: 5.73% 1 Year Adj: 5.29% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||