![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
October 7, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Is Dot-com Discounting Dead?
by Blanche Evans
Several prominent e-brokerages have gone out of business, but does that herald a significant trend? Many traditional brokerages would like to think so, but there's just as much evidence that e-brokerages are here to stay, especially when they start adopting traditional practices like building a local market and hiring lots of Realtors. When prominent national e-brokerages such as Homebytes.com and eHome announced that they were going out of business, traditional brokers such as Daryl Jesperson, president of RE/MAX International said, "The Internet is here to stay, but real estate agents who will be successful in this new era will be closer to the older business model than the new one in that they actually have a service to offer in exchange for compensation. No longer controlling listing information, they will remain indispensable to consumers as interpreters of information." But even while keeping a wary eye on e-brokers, other traditionals such as Coldwell Banker, quietly developed a parallel brokerage beta-model, an MLS listing service for FSBOs, complete with e-marketing on Realtor.com and ColdwellBanker.com. Coldwell Banker managed to figure out a way to capture the elusive FSBO with an irresistible lure - access to marquee-name brokerage services without paying full service commissions. Sellers show their own homes, but it they get tired of that, the company will turn them over to a full-service CB broker with no penalty. While a business model has yet to be announced, the odds are good that Blue Edge Realty will be sold as a local franchise to local Coldwell Banker brokers who can use the service to steer prospects to its full-service bricks and sticks offices. The promise of the e-brokers was to deliver full-service brokerage while leveraging the cost efficiencies of the Internet to consumers. All offered lower than traditional commission schedules, and most offered cash rebates to buyers and sellers who use their services. EHome had a list of services posted on its Web site, defying full service brokers to top them in service delivery. While they were able to match traditional brokerages service for service, what they didn't have was enough money to deploy the concept across the country. And that's where the e-brokers made their mistake. The e-brokers were competing on a local level with national tools. While they were busy building brand recognition for themselves, their competition, the traditional brokers, were beating the pants off them in triplicate. The e-brokers would advertise their brand in local newspapers, while other brokers advertised their national affiliations, local offices and their agents did their own personal marketing, swamping the lean e-brokerages with more advertising dollars and more personal coverage house-to-house than the e-brokers could ever hope to overcome. In an interview with Scott Kucirek, cofounder of zipRealty, a few months ago, Agent News asked Kucirek why his company was pulling back from expansion. He responded that zipRealty planned to dig into the markets where they were currently operating to build market share. "All we need is more agents," said Kucirek. In the past that is exactly how brokers have built their market share - at the local level and by adding more agents to build the brand. How Kucirek, et al, could have outgunned deeply entrenched market leaders with only one or two agents per territory is unclear. And now the e-brokers plan to take on the traditionals where it matters - locally. Consider the following. While Wall Street is cold on dot-coms, venture capital firms are still hot on e-brokerages. They see discount full-service e-brokerage as innovative:
Kurt Chou, recruiting manager for zipRealty.com says the company plans on hiring about 150 agents for its 15 metros by the end of the year. "Our compensation is incentive-driven based on production. The agents do get a complete benefits package, in addition to full listing and advertising support and working with quality leads." Isn't that pretty close to a traditional brokerage? "If you can find one that offers benefits, leads and transactional support," said Chou. "We reward our agents more effectively. We're not saying this is better, but it is different, because we aren't discouting service. We are setting up our agents to be more successful because they aren't dealing with the overhead of a traditional setup. If they work hard they should be more successful consistently." Dot-com discounting isn't dead. It just got a second wind. Or a second round, if you prefer. Published: June 12, 2001 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||