![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
August 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
eRealty's VOW-based Listing Agreements With Yahoo! Okay By NAR
by Blanche Evans
Some brokers and MLSs are upset that multi-state brokerage eRealty is using its MLS data downloads as a means to provide exclusive access to listings in key relocation destinations across the U.S. on the Yahoo! Real Estate portal. Is eRealty side-stepping MLS rules or has the company found a clever use for listings to give them a competitive edge on leading portals? For the answer, Agent News asked Laurie Janik, general counsel to the NAR. "My view is that a large broker may cut a deal with Yahoo! because they have listings in many marketplaces, but there are rules that governing the distribution of listings," says Janik. "The means of distribution can be faxing, mailing, handing it out to buyers in the office, or delivering it electronically." "Our rules govern what information can be provided and how much, but our rules don't discriminate between methods of delivery," she clarifies. "The same rules that have always applied to access to information will apply to the Internet environment." According to a white paper published by the NAR: "(Internet Data Exchange) IDX is a form of public advertising, while VOWs are a ways for participants to provide clients or customers with listing information responding to their stated needs in much the same way as they would give information to a client or customer sitting in their office." MLSs can establish reasonable rules and regulations related to participating virtual VOWs including requiring that the listing agent's contact information remains on the listing, for example. "The concept is that I can go to Yahoo! and am passed to eRealty's virtual office," explains Janik. "At that point I am going to get agency disclosures, and terms of use and the I am going to have to agree to the terms. It's an online environment that gives a similar experience as in a brick and mortar office where you would receive a printout of listings." "I don't consider this a loophole, as this has been around for a while," says Janik. "What is new is eRealty has an exclusive relationship with Yahoo!." "I did see a trademark misuse on the Chicago search that I didn't like," adds Janik, "but if I know eRealty, they will fix it as soon as they are aware of it." The NAR's position means that any broker with a direct data feed from the local MLS can do the same thing as eRealty, or the broker can choose the MLSs IDX solution instead. "IDX is advertising with no strings attached," says Janik. "A VOW is a parallel to a broker's office, so a site where you have to declare yourself a bonafide seeker of property might deter some people. With a VOW, you have to qualify the prospect, obtain their identity, give agency disclosures before you tell them what type of property you can show them, find out what type of agency they are interested in." Russell Capper, CEO of eRealty told Agent News that "About 80 or 90 percent of people choose not to agree to the terms of use." But the ones that do agree to the terms give their contact information, making them stronger candidates as leads. It seems that eRealty has found a clever way to do something other brokers have not been able to do - hurdle past listing brokers as the first point of contact. Due to the listings-centric nature of most national listings portals, most agents and brokers can only be found via their active listings or paid advertising tools. While Yahoo! would not disclose their financial terms (whether they are accepting referral or advertising fees) for allowing brokers exclusive portal rights for city searches on Yahoo! Real Estate, a spokesperson said, "Yahoo! Real Estate would make an arrangement with a broker who'd like to take advantage of the advertising opportunity." Published: March 8, 2002 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||