![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
September 5, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pigging Out on Capital Hill
by Lew Sichelman
Your tax money at work: $190,000 for the Motor Racing Museum of the South in Spartanburg, S.C.; $2.25 million to provide winter amusement opportunities for military personnel and civilians at the North Star Borough Birch Hill recreation area in Alaska, and $1.5 million for the University of Missouri's Center for Gender Physiology so it can study gender-related issues in space flight crews. That's not the worst of it, either. According to the Citizens Against Government Waste, a total of $1.57 billion in pork barrel waste was earmarked by lawmakers in the fiscal 2002 funding bill for the Department of Housing and Urban Development. That's down 3 percent from $1.62 billion in fiscal '01. But the number of individual HUD/VA projects increased by 19 percent, from 1,200 to 1,428. So the reckless spenders in Washington are paying out less per project, but they're financing more of them. And you wonder where the budget surplus has gone? According to CAGW, a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization which has taken it upon itself to eliminate waste, mismanagement and inefficiency in the federal government, Congress pigged out with a record 801 grants under HUD's economic development initiative program, including one for a music conservatory in Westchester County, N.Y., one of the richest counties in the country. Although members of the House requested nothing under EDI for fiscal '02 and the Senate asked for just $130 million worth, the conference committee ended up with $294 million, including a total of $15 million for theaters, museums, performing arts centers and opera houses. At least the big spenders have a cultural bent. That's how it works on Capital Hill. Appropriators frequently disregard the budget requests of the various federal agencies. Instead, they earmark thousands or unrequested and non-competitive projects of dubious distinction. And if you are not a member of either Appropriations Committees, you simply promise votes on other issues in return for funding for your pet project back home. "They get the goods through a form of legal money laundering, but taxpayers receive only inflated taxes and a bloated bureaucracy," CAGW says in the latest edition of the "Pig Book Summary." Of course, HUD/VA appropriators are hardly alone. The porkers almanac counts 8,341 projects totaling $20.1 billion in the 13 different funding bills that symbolize the most egregious and blatant examples of pork. The worst offenders were three powerful senior legislators -- the ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), and two democrats, Daniel Inouye of Hawaii and Robert Byrd of West Virginia. Sen. Stevens is listed first, not just because of his longevity but also because he's the leader of the pack, winning $711 in pork per capita for the people of Alaska. That's 22 times the national average. Sens. Inouye and Byrd were the runners up, with $353 and $215 per capita, respectively, for their constituents. Incidently, for an item to be considered pork by CAGW, it has to meet one of seven criteria, though most in the book satisfy at least two:
Published: May 15, 2002 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws.
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 6.40% 15 Year Fixed: 5.93% 1 Year Adj: 5.33% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||