![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
November 23, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Racial Lending Disparities Widen
by Lew Sichelman
Despite years of efforts to put minority home buyers on an even keel with their white counterparts, lending disparities between the races not only haven't improved, they've actually worsened, a group of community activists charged this week. In a report that studied the latest federal data, the Chicago-based Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now said that on a national basis, African Americans applying for conventional home loans last year were 2.31 times more likely to be rejected than whites and Latinos were turned away 1.53 times more often than whites. In both cases, ACORN said, the deviations were greater last year than the year before. Blacks were spurned in their efforts to obtain conventional mortgages at a 2.07 greater rate than whites in 2000; Latinos were rejected at a rate that was 1.45 greater. ACORN President Maude Hurd called the denial rates "a substantial shift in the wrong direction," and said they should be a "wake-up call" to both lenders and regulators. "It is impossible to overstate the damage caused by these inequalities," she said at a press conference on the steps of a house in Washington's low-income Anacostia neighborhood where nearly two dozen families discussed their inability to find conventional financing. "Without access to credit on fair terms, communities have no hope of emerging into strong, stable and safe neighborhoods." But Joe Belew, president of the Consumer Bankers Association in Arlington, Va., discounted ACORN's conclusions, saying they "don't hold together." Belew said lenders are "every bit as interested in increasing home ownership opportunities" as anyone else. "There's absolutely no reason to deny qualified applicants," he said. He also noted that federal banking regulators are looking hard for bias in the lending process but are not finding any. "The fact is that banks have continually improved their outreach, and applicants who are turned down initially are almost always given a second look," the industry spokesman said. "Anybody who is denied ought to go back in or apply elsewhere." But ACORN's Hurd said the problem of racial disparity cannot be explained away," either as a consequence of acceptable practices or with the assertion that minorities have worse credit than whites. ACORN is the nation's largest community-based organization, with more than 120,000 low and moderate-income members organized into 600 neighborhood chapters in 45 cities. Even though denial rates fell significantly for all races between 2000 and 2001, the study said the deviation in rates between Blacks, Latinos and whites widened nationally largely because denial rates fell more quickly for Caucasians than minorities. But that should not be misinterpreted to mean lower income whites face none of the hurdles other races face in obtaining a mortgage, it cautioned. "Traditional lending institutions continue to fail to adequately serve low and moderate-income communities of all races," it said. According to the ACORN study, low and moderate-income neighborhoods comprise 26 percent of the country, yet they received just 12 percent of all conventional loans. The study also found that differences in denial rates were evident even when comparing loan applicants of the same income, and was actually worse in the upper-income brackets. Higher income African Americans were rejected almost three times more frequently than their white counterparts while upper income Latinos were turned down more than twice as often. "Even more disturbing," the report said, is that higher income Blacks were rebuffed more often than moderate income whites "whose incomes were only about half as large." According to the report, the share of conventional loans made to African Americans and Latinos lags "far behind" their proportion of the population. Blacks account for nearly 13 percent of the population, yet received just under 5 percent of the conventional purchase loans last year. Likewise, Latinos comprise almost 13 percent of the populace but received only 7.5 percent of such loans. And the figures for conventional loans would be "far worse" if subprime loans were not counted as conventional loans, the report added. Because traditional lenders "have excluded too many lower income and minority families from the economic mainstream," the study said, borrowers with credit issues often are forced to turn to subprime lenders who offer less beneficial terms at higher rates and more fees than their counterparts who lend only to customers with pristine credit records. In 2000, 18.3 percent of the conventional purchase money mortgages received by African Americans were subprime loans, as were 12.2 percent of those to Latinos. In contrast, just 4.7 percent of such loans made to whites were considered subprime Other key findings: Published: October 9, 2002 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 4.83% 15 Year Fixed: 4.32% 1 Year Adj: 4.35% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
Spotlight
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||