![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
December 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Caution for Canadian Hosts & Property Owners
by PJ Wade
Although Canadians know that drinking at office parties may cause problems for employers, few may understand the risks they run when they entertain in their own homes over the holiday season. If a guest has a car accident after drinking at your house, you could face a costly court case. Two recent Ontario judgements have failed to hold a party host liable for damages, however, in both cases, the hosts went through the agony of being implicated in a tragedy and had to bear the high cost of defending themselves in court. The Canada Safety Council (CSC) and Mothers Against Drunk Driving Canada (MADD) caution Canadian hosts to ensure their guests do not drive home impaired. If you decide to serve alcohol, plan for taxi rides, designated drivers or overnight stays. On New Year’s Eve 1999, a young woman was left paraplegic and her boyfriend was killed when their car was struck by a drunk driver. The man driving the car that hit theirs had been drinking at a house party. He had 2.5 times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood. Because his hosts were aware of his drinking problems and previous drunk driving convictions and knew he was driving, the victim sued the hosts arguing that they were liable because they did not try to stop the man from driving. A judge finally dismissed the case in August 2002 because he ruled that hosts of parties cannot be held financially liable for the actions of guests who drive drunk. However, these rulings on liabilities may change as attitudes continue to turn against driving drunk. The courts have already established that offering free taxi rides is no longer enough. Private party hosts and employers who plan to serve alcohol or who organize a Bring-Your-Own-Bottle event, have a responsibility to prevent their guests from taking the wheel after drinking. The Canada Safety Council offers these tips to hosts: “Alcohol-related crashes still cause far too many unnecessary and preventable tragedies,” says CSC president Emile Therien. “The progress is encouraging, but we can’t let our guard down.” According to the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF), 906 people died in road crashes involving a driver who had been drinking in 1999. This marks a 30% drop over five years; the equivalent statistic for 1995 was 1,296. Preliminary figures for 2000 indicate a further 5% drop. The permissible blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in Canada’s Criminal Code ( 0.08 or 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milligrams of blood) applies nationally. In addition, all provinces, except Quebec, have short-term administrative roadside suspensions at 0.05 or lower. These measures reportedly have proven to be effective tools in the fight against impaired driving, in part because they provide swift and certain punishment. CSC believes there is “overwhelming evidence” that further lowering the criminal BAC limit would make little difference in the overall context of current policies, programs and procedures. In a letter to MADD Canada, which is lobbying to have the criminal BAC lowered to 0.05, Therien said: “The real issue is not that the law needs to be changed but that resources are urgently needed to help police enforce the 0.08 limit, to enable courts and crown attorneys to process charges quickly and efficiently, and to treat offenders with alcohol problems.” Help make this a reduced-liability and tragedy-free holiday for you and your guests. Published: December 10, 2002 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 15 Year Fixed: 1 Year Adj: (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines
Spotlight
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||