![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
September 5, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cendant Real Estate Division Issues VOW Recommendation
by Blanche Evans
The Cendant Real Estate Services Division has issued a white paper titled "The Emerging Issues Posed By The Misuse Of Virtual Office Web Sites (VOWs): The Potential Downside OF VOWs" which outlines the franchise giant's strong positions on how it would like to see the NAR leadership vote on the issue of VOWs. Cendant would like to see three conditions met by VOWs:
Without an opt-in/opt-out requirement, argues Cendant, "there is a likelihood that local brokers will seek to avoid sharing listings with the applicable MLS in order to prevent otherwise unauthorized incorporation of the listings into third-party VOWs." To date, this is the strongest dissenting vote ever cast on the topic of VOWs. Cendant leadership is focused on the use of some VOWs to charge referral fees to brokers who help supply the VOWs with listings via the MLS database. They want such practices stopped. The corporation's white paper makes its case by stating that both IDX (broker-approved publication of listings) and VOWs present the "potential to undermine the profitability of real estate brokerage firms and increase costs to consumers." Cendant and its brands state that they strongly believe "that the unregulated proliferation of VOWs will ultimately increase the cost to consumers and hurt the economic viability of America's real estate brokerages. Further, the company says that proponents of VOWs are "engaged in a subterfuge, the purpose of which is to mask attempts by third-party aggregators to create non-value-added revenue streams solely for their benefit." The paper describes differences between IDX and VOWs, calling IDX "nothing more than a limited electronic MLS book allowing consumers to view basic information about any number of properties across a local marketplace," allowing consumers to seek a single source for listings, cutting home search times. They also allow brokers new Internet outlets for advertising their listings, inexpensively. VOWs, as defined by the white paper, "differ from IDX by essentially taking the IDX platform at least one step further." VOWS are "private business platforms that are designed to facilitate actual transactions" by registering consumers and delivering them as leads to other companies and sales agents, in some cases. VOW technology, along with policies that promote the same, "creates an opportunity for large third-party service providers such as Internet Web sites and search engines to obtain real estate brokerage licenses ( or align with other licensed brokers) and subsequently aggregate real estate listings." The size and marketing power of these aggregators make it not feasible for a local real estate company to compete. Consumers would make these aggregators the "go-to" site, giving the sites the ability to create "a for-profit business model whereby they would register these...consumers, and ....hand off such...leads to local real estate brokerage offices." To view the white paper in a PDF file, click here The white paper has already been sent to NAR leadership, and the franchise giant's real estate division CEOs say their position speaks for many independent brokers in the industry. Published: March 5, 2003 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||