![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
December 4, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Just Say No To Copyright Violations
by Blanche Evans
A new Website dedicated to gathering strength in numbers has been circulating to try to get Realtors to "just say no" to Realtor.com, but Realty Times has another bone to pick with the site - copyright infringement. Before we begin, let me say that free speech is a wonderful thing. It's what makes this country great. What also makes this country great is protection of intellectual property. In journalism, this is called a copyright. Realtors from all over the country are forwarding a new site to each other called Just Say No To Realtor.com. The site is a rallying cry to get Realtor.com to lower its new prices. But in trying to get its message across, the site is creating another wrong to make a right - using Realty Times' content without permission. The reason this is wrong is twofold: it's a copyright infringement to use someone else's content without permission, and it also implies that Realty Times is endorsing this site and contributed material toward its success when we did no such thing. We have asked the site to remove material attributed to me, Blanche Evans, as well as unattributed material from Realty Times. Immediately. Since 1997, Realty Times staff and I have worked hard to build our site's readership and credibility into the leading real estate news service in the nation. We have done so, winning numerous awards in the process, including "Blanche Evans, one of the "25 Most Influential People In Real Estate," NAR editors, December 2000; "Best Real Estate News," Yahoo! Internet Life, March 2002; and "Best of the Web: Buying and Selling," Money Magazine, June 2003. Realty Times is a content provider on the most trafficked real estate portals in the world, as well as a majority of Realtor associations, franchise Websites, and broker and agent Websites. This is goodwill that is priceless, and not to be taken for unauthorized use by anyone else. While it is flattering that the Just Say No Webmaster believes that our material will help his cause, the site and its founders have no right to make use our material or imply an endorsement from us that we have never given. Using our material without permission threatens both our credibility and our business model, and those are only two good reasons why copyright laws are in place - to prevent such abuses. The Just Say No To Realtor.com Website, under a headline called "Is There Strength In Numbers? Read what happened just two short years ago with Homestore! Then sign the virtual petition today to send Homestore another message!", copied and pasted from our site a story I wrote two years ago: No Listings For Bank Of America, Says Realtor.com. While I'm credited as the author, the Realty Times copyright is nowhere to be found. Guess what, Just Say No Webmaster? That's a copyright violation. I never gave you permission to post this story and neither did anyone else at Realty Times. As the publisher, the copyright belongs to Realty Times, and you did not obtain permission to post this story in your publication. And in case you didn't know, your Website is a publication which means it is subject to copyright laws. Using my story with my name implies that I gave you the story as an endorsement of what you are doing. I did not, and I resent that whomever put this Website together thought it was OK to use my work and the goodwill generated by the use of my name without my permission. In another copyright violation, the site has posted "excerpts" of Realty Times stories, without giving any attribution to the author, me, or Realty Times. This is a huge copyright no-no. The use of these stories didn't result in any traffic to Realty Times that help our advertisers or our subscribers. Realty Times nor I were paid or offered anything for the use of this material. Again, that is the reason for copyright law - so that another Website can't lessen a site's value by publishing its content without permission. To be generous, which I really don't have to be with two flagrant copyright violations in hand, I'll assume that the site was put together with good intentions but in total ignorance of copyright laws. So if that is the case, let me spell it out for you, Well-meaning-But-Ignorant-Webmaster:
Editor's note: I did hear from the Webmaster who informed me that the Realty Times stories would be removed, or links to the stories provided, and he also provided a very nice apology. So why publish this story? We don't know how many people saw the stories before they were corrected or how much damage to our business may have been done, and hopefully, someone else with the same idea will be discouraged from using our content without permission in the future. B.E. Published: May 30, 2003 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||