![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| February 10, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Living Trusts Are Not For Everyone
by Benny L. Kass
Q. I would like to leave my property to the only surviving member of my immediate family, and have been considering setting up a living trust to do so. I would like him to inherit the property in as trouble-free a manner as possible. I have heard that a living trust passes the property in trust to a beneficiary without having to go through probate. That is very appealing to me. I have also heard that establishing title to the property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship would also allow the property to pass to my relative without having to go through probate. Could you please compare the advantages and disadvantages of leaving property through a living trust with having title as joint tenants with the right of survivorship? A. Living trusts are seminar and "cocktail party" conversation topics, and certainly should be considered in estate and retirement planning. However, you must explore all of the pros and cons, as well as other alternatives before deciding to create a living trust – also called a revocable trust. A trust is a legal document which means that legal title to property is held by one or more trustees for the “benefit” of someone else. Thus the meaning of the word "beneficiary." Depending on the kind of trust involved, the trustee is often responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of that property for the ultimate beneficiary of the property. There are many kinds of trusts; the most common is a "deed of trust." This is the mortgage instrument, whereby the homeowner borrows money from a lender, and deeds the house in trust to a person or institution selected by the lender. If the borrower pays the money in full, the trustee releases the trust; if the borrower becomes delinquent, the trustee exercises the powers provided in the legal document to sell the property at a "trustee's" foreclosure sale. A testamentary trust is established by an individual's Will, and comes into being on the death of that person. Many people consider placing their property in trust on their death if, for example, their children are young, and they want to make sure that the children can continue to stay in the house under the supervision of a trustee and a guardian. In this example, the trust will generally end when the children reach a certain age, and that decision is made by you when you write your Will, which creates the Trust. Under a testamentary trust, the terms of the trust must be spelled out to assure that the trustee fully understands his or her role and duties, since you are deceased. As with every trust, the trustee has a fiduciary responsibility to the beneficiary, and cannot squander or steal the trust assets. A revocable or living trust is created while you are living. This is also called an "inter vivos" trust, which is a Latin term meaning "between the living." This trust is revocable, which means that the individual creating the trust (called the "grantor") has the right to change its terms or cancel (revoke) the trust at any time, for any reason, during his or her lifetime. The primary reason for establishing a living trust is to avoid probate proceedings, which can be a time-consuming and costly process. When property is held in a living trust, the trustee -- and not the individual (the grantor) -- owns the property, and in general only property owned by the deceased individually is probated. In other words, the property held in a living trust is outside of the deceased person’s probate estate. Much has been written about the problems and delays of the probate process. However, in recent years, legislation has been enacted in many states -- including the District of Columbia -- to modernize and speed up the process. The National Conference on Uniform State Laws – an organization comprised of lawyers, legislators and law professors (all appointed by the Governor of each State and the Mayor of the District of Columbia) – has promulgated the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), which has been enacted by a number of States. This Act, which has the strong support of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), has greatly simplified and expedited the probate process, and at least in those states which have the UPC, one need not be as concerned about the horror stories which have been so prevalent when discussing probate practice. For many years, the secondary mortgage market did not accept mortgages where the borrower was an inter vivos revocable trust. However, several years ago, Fannie Mae announced that it will accept inter vivos revocable trusts as eligible borrowers for mortgages under certain conditions, including: There are other advantages to a living trust. For example, if you own property in more than one state, on your death, probate proceedings may need to take place in each state where property is located. These are usually referred to as "ancillary probate." Clearly, when property is held in a living trust, these ancillary proceedings may not be necessary. Another advantage is privacy. Probate is a matter of public record, whereas living trusts are private. Some individuals may not want to disclose who their ultimate beneficiaries will be, and the living trust provides a modicum of privacy. However, there are also pitfalls in the use of the living trust. Although I have indicated that for ownership purposes, the trustee -- and not the grantor -- is the legal title owner of the property, for tax purposes, the property in a trust remains the property of the grantor. Contrary to popular opinion, living trusts do not save estate taxes, and they do not save income taxes. No matter how many times this is said, some people either do not hear it or do not believe it. There are also increased costs as a result of the creation of such a living trust. You have indicated that your attorney wants to charge you $2,500 for his/her legal services. Furthermore, you will have to incur administrative and recording costs. The paperwork that the trust has to handle may be as great a burden as having to go through the probate proceedings. More importantly, even if you set up a living trust, you must still have a Will. Most people own more than their house, and especially if there are children involved, or other assets, it is imperative to have a Will (referred to as a pour-over Will) to make clear your intentions as to how the rest of your property will be disposed of on your death. With a Will, even if there is a cumbersome probate proceeding, at least your intentions have been made known; without a Will, the intestacy laws in the state where you were domiciled on the date of your death will determine who will receive your assets. Living trusts are an option to be considered. However, you should do a complete asset check to determine how serious your estate will be impacted by the probate proceedings. For example, other assets may already be probate proof, such as life insurance proceeds, IRAs, or other retirement benefits. Everyone must consult his or her tax and financial advisors before taking any action that could be costly to you and to your heirs. Once you have decided to go forward with the living trust, you should consult several attorneys who specialize in Estate planning. Compare their fees. The $2,500 fee may or may not be realistic or competitive. Lawyers do not always charge on an hourly basis; some bill on a product basis – so much for a Will, so much for a real estate settlement, and so much for an uncontested divorce. Should you prepare the papers yourself? That certainly is a possibility, and there are a number of good “do it yourself” books on the subject of the Living Trust. It does not take a rocket scientist to prepare the Trust documents. However, there is always a risk that you may have missed a legal technicality, and as a result, your Trust may be declared invalid. As the old saying goes, “you get what you pay for”! Now let’s turn to the other option, namely adding your relative to title as a joint tenant with right of survivorship. When title is held as “joint tenant”, upon the death of one tenant, the other tenant automatically will own the property. You are correct; probate is not necessary in order to give the property to your relative. But, there is a major downside to this. Let us assume that you purchased the property many years ago for $50,000 and it is now worth $500,000. If you add your relative to the title, in effect you are giving him a gift of half of the property. Thus, there may be gift tax complications for you (not for him) and you have to discuss this with your tax advisor. More significantly, however, the tax basis of the donor becomes the tax basis of the donee. In our example, your basis (assuming no improvements to the property) is $50,000. When you give half of the property to your relative, his basis will be $25,000. Let us further assume that on your death, the property is worth $600,000. Your relative’s basis will thus be $325,000 (his basis of $25,000 plus half of the value of the property on the date of death, i.e. $300,000). This is known as the stepped up basis. Should your relative sell the property for $600,000, for tax purposes he will have made a profit of $275,000. Unless he has lived in the property for at least two years out of five years before the date of the sale, he will have to pay capital gains tax on all of this “profit”. There is yet a third alternative; prepare a Will and have the house go to your relative through the Will. Yes, he will have to go to Probate. But his basis in the property will be $600,000 (the value on the date of death), and should he sell the property immediately for that price, he will made no taxable gain and thus will not have to pay any capital gains tax. This is obviously complicated. You want to be generous, but you don’t want to put an unnecessary financial burden on your relative. Talk to your financial advisors before you do anything. There is an old adage “Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth”. That may be true, but to the Citizens of Troy – and to the IRS – you have to be cautious. Published: August 11, 2003 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles: |
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.87% 15 Year Fixed: 3.16% 1 Year Adj: 2.78% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 08/11/2003
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||