![]() |
Real Estate News and Advice |
July 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discounters VS Traditionals: Are They Different Or The Same?
by Blanche Evans
A reporter from a major financial magazine called recently wanting to brainstorm a theory - that it is the discounters in real estate which are causing real estate commissions to come down. While discounters have had an impact by making it easier for consumers to get a "discount," there are other points to consider. First, discounting isn't new, second, the "standard" commission fee has already trended downward, and third, commissions can no longer be tracked accurately because of new business models, among other food for thought. "Discounters" have been around since "organized" real estate brokerage began over one hundred years ago. What makes some brokerages seem shiny and new is their use of the Internet and branding. How could brand names like eRealty and zipRealty not appeal to the homebuyers who love using the Internet? Their "discount" models are based on acquiring listings from the MLS (other brokers) and making them available to the public so that the public does much of the search and pre-selling of homes to themselves. Communications are also taken care of as much as possible online, saving expensive in-person sales activities which also lowers overhead. But discounters may have more in common with full-commission brokers than differences. One of the CEO's of these companies once showed his hand that despite being able to offer lower costs to consumers, the problems of running a brokerage, no matter how streamlined, are the same. He said, "All I need are 50 more good agents." That's a statement that could have come from the mouth of any broker in America. The "standard" commission rate quoted so slavishly by the media is no longer at six to seven percent. In fact, it's been dropping for years, say industry insiders. No less than three separate polls have "estimated" the "average" commission rate at 4.2, 5.1, and 5.4 percent, none of which is near six or seven percent. But neither has a new norm for commissions been established for the media and public to chew upon. They want to know where to begin commission negotiations. If commissions are negotiable, why should the industry tell them the bidding begins at 5.5 percent when six or seven percent will buy a little more wiggle room? All the discounters are saying is there is no more wiggle room. The commission is no longer negotiable because it has already been established at the lowest level the company feels it can do business. To complicate matters even further, there is some question about what fees the commission rate covers. Traditionally, the listing broker negotiates a brokerage commission fee with the seller. The listing broker then puts the listing into an MLS with a co-op fee offered to selling brokers to be paid out of the listing broker's commission fee. However, newer business models, including exclusive buyer's agency, reject these fees in favor of negotiating their own fees with their buyers which are paid out of the proceeds of the transaction. Are these fees accounted for when commission polls of agents are taken? We don't know. The practice of giving consumers rebates out of broker commissions has grown as well, with no evidence that such rebates or gift certificates, which are paid for out of commission proceeds, are counted in or subtracted from commissions. So, when polls are taken, what is the accurate number? Are discounts the same as rebates? That can also be debated, but they can have the same net effect. Many traditional brokers are accepting leads from lead generation companies such as LendingTree in which consumers are rewarded with gift certificates. How are those commissions accounted for? Again, we don't know. How well the discount companies are doing financially is anyone's guess, but it could be telling that only this year, eRealty, before it's acquisition by Prudential, and zipRealty, ahead of its pending IPO, raised their commission rates to be nearly in line with competing traditional service providers. Therefore, it's difficult to nail down whether discounters are impacting commissions or not. If discounting isn't new, and a standard commission nationwide can't be quantified, and the lines of discounting are blurred, who's to say all brokers aren't discounters? Published: August 11, 2004 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Spotlight
Today's Headlines
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
|
||||||||||||||||||