![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| May 25, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Ask the HOA Expert
by Richard Thompson
Question: Our collection policy states that if an owner is 30 days past due, the management company sends a pre-lien notice letter. Several board members think the board members should be notified when these letters are sent. Answer: When a collection process is implemented, the board should be kept apprised of the progress. It is easily and cheaply done by email to all board members. It is standard procedure for the management company to keep the client informed of significant events like this. Question: We are having a difficult time with our management company providing accurate, complete and timely financial statements. Month after month, the same problems. We've written them letters and met with them in person yet no improvement. We've had it and want to terminate the contract but fear they won't release us. Answer: Providing accurate and timely financial reports is an HOA management company's highest priority since money is an essential component of the HOA's operation. An occasional error is to be expected but ongoing errors is another matter. Either the management company is doing it correctly or not. Numbers don't lie (except at Enron). Management contracts cut both ways. If one party is not living up to its end of the bargain, it has no right to continue. The board or HOA's attorney should advise the management company of the specific breaches that are the basis for termination. If the facts are true, there should be no argument. Question: Our board of directors recently passed the following resolutions. Be it resolved that:
Answer: Clearly the board has many issues with the current management company which need to be resolved, and soon. Observations based on your numbered resolutions:
Question: Do board members have a legal responsibility to follow the reserve study recommendations? Answer: The board should be careful about deviating from reserve study recommendations. Most reserve studies recommend a funding plan that steers the HOA away from special assessments. If the board decides to fund reserves less, the risk of special assessment grows. If a special assessment is called for due to under funding, a case could be made that the board did not fulfill its fiduciary duty and be held personally liable. And just as importantly, past owners who have sold will not have paid their fair share. Unless there is a compelling reason to deviate, the board should follow the recommendations. For more Ask the HOA Expert, see Regenesis.net. Published: July 12, 2006 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles:
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.83% 15 Year Fixed: 3.05% 1 Year Adj: 2.73% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 07/12/2006
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||