![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| February 10, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Lawmakers Continue to Pig Out
by Lew Sichelman
Stop the scanners! Your lawmakers here in Washington earmarked money for fewer of their pet projects in fiscal 2006 than they did in fiscal '05? But despite the 29 percent decrease in the number of pork-barrel projects, from 13,997 to 9,963, it's hard to say Congress is showing restraint. After all, the people you send to the Nation's Capital to represent your interests spent a record $29 billion -- that's billion, with a capital B -- on pork last year, according to Citizens Against Government Waste. As it has every year for the last 16, the private, nonprofit group, which claims to represent more than 1.2 million like-minded people who think lawmakers ought to cool it with the pork, has published the Pig Book summary, which details a wave of spending on what appear to be useless projects. By now, everyone is aware of the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska, where Sen. Ted Stevens (R) brought home the bacon. But did you know that lawmakers also gave $13.5 million to the International Fund for Ireland to help finance the World Toilet Summit? Or that they gave $1 million to fund the Waterfree Urinal Conservation Institute? Or that they handed over half-a-mil to the Sparta (N.C.) Teapot Museum? Speaking about Washington's mushrooming appetite for pork, CAGW's Tom Finnegan says raiding the Treasury like this "is a long-practiced art" among lawmakers. "Year after year," he says, they "debase the political process by directing chunks of the federal budget back to their home districts and states to promote their own re-elections and reward special interests." It's nice, of course, if you are on the receiving end of Congress's largesse. But $29 billion? When there is a projected budget deficit of $371 billion? And a national debt of $8.5 trillion? The 375 projects totaling $3.4 billion in this year's pink book symbolize the most egregious and blatant examples of pork. To qualify, incidentally, the project must meet one of seven criteria: Requested by only chamber of Congress, not specifically authorized, not competitively bid, not requested by the White House, greatly exceeds the President's budget request or last year's funding, not the subject of Congressional hearings, or serves only a local or special interest. For what it's worth, most items in the book satisfy at least two of these requirements. Each of the 11 major appropriations bills passed last year contains pork. But since this venue is about real estate, let's take a look at some of the juicier items in the measure to fund the Transportation, Treasury and Housing and Urban Development departments:
And then there are these earmarks, which, while not related to real estate, are still of more than passing interest. As in why are we paying for this?:
Finally, a deeper look at the aforementioned Teapot Museum, which is intended to boost tourism in Sparta, N.C., by exposing visitors to an "unexpected" art form. I'm on my way. How about you? Taxpayers, says the pink book, "should be steamed" the half-a-million dollars they are spending on this project is going up in smoke. Published: July 12, 2006 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws. Related Articles: |
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.87% 15 Year Fixed: 3.16% 1 Year Adj: 2.78% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 07/12/2006
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||