![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| February 10, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Investor Report: Mixed 1031 Signals
by Kenneth R. Harney
When it comes to Section 1031 (ten thirty one) tax-deferred real estate exchanges, investors are getting some decidedly mixed signals. On the one hand, there have been a number of high-profile financial failures of exchange intermediary companies, the folks who hold your money while the exchange is underway, putting small investors at risk of losing some or all their cash. On the other hand, smaller-scale, long-time exchange intermediaries insist their business models are safe for investors -- they're well insured and bonded and pose no risk of loss at all. The recent bankruptcy filing of one of the country's largest exchange intermediaries, Land America 1031 Exchange Services of Richmond, Virginia, froze nearly $420 million in funds held by the company on behalf of 450 investor clients. Exchange intermediaries hold funds generated by Section 1031 real estate swaps. IRS rules require some form of independent middleman because the tax code prohibits receipt of cash by exchangers seeking to defer capital gains taxes. The problem posed by intermediaries is that, in the event they experience financial distress, they may file for bankruptcy protection and claim the right to use escrowed funds from ongoing exchanges to pay creditors. In the LandAmerica case, the intermediary disputed investors' claims that the company was holding their money in trust - making it untouchable by creditors in a bankruptcy. A federal judge is still looking at the arguments, and a resolution may be months away. Meanwhile, small-scale exchange intermediaries around the country continue to handle clients' funds with no losses. Bill Horan, co-owner and vice president of Realty Exchange Corp, based in Gainesville, Virginia, argues that, with due diligence, "investors can do 1031 transactions through qualified intermediaries with complete confidence," he told Realty Times last week. In Littleton, New Hampshire, the firm of Edmund & Wheeler focuses on smaller and medium-sized real estate exchanges, and this month posted guidelines for investors on what to look for in choosing an intermediary - essentially how to avoid a middleman that could cost you pain, time and money. Tops on the list: Look for extensive track records of successful exchanges, documented by references from investors. Make sure the intermediary has substantial insurance coverage to protect you - including bonding and errors and omissions. Check how the intermediary handles client funds. Are exchange escrows deposited in a reputable, well capitalized bank? Does the intermediary commingle clients' funds or create separate, safer individualized accounts? How accessible are top executives to you as a client? Can you get funds out quickly if you need to? All good questions and advice for anyone contemplating a 1031 exchange in troubled times. Published: February 27, 2009 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws.
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.87% 15 Year Fixed: 3.16% 1 Year Adj: 2.78% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 02/27/2009
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||