![]() Real Estate News and Advice |
| May 25, 2012 |
|
Need Product Help?
Local Guides
All Local Guides
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Real Estate Commission Dilemma
by PJ Wade
As I write this column on the eve of The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) Special General Meeting in Newfoundland, where the membership will vote on the proposed consent agreement negotiated with The Commissioner of Competition, I am aware that whatever the outcome (by now all of that has been hashed and rehashed in the news), the real estate industry in Canada has changed. Not necessarily for the better, and certainly not in ways real estate professionals would prefer—or at least that is how most consumers see things. Is this merely a failure to communicate value? Real estate commissions of about 5% of the sale price have become the deal breaker for consumers. Commission fees for the sale of homes worth hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars have netted real estate brokerages and salespeople tens of thousands of dollars per sale—and a lot of consumer resentment at the same time. In the boom years of the 21st Century, the internet has made these transactions look too easy to arrange and, therefore, too expensive based on current commission rates and levels of service. When substantial business change occurs principally as a reaction against pricing, consumers and business can lose. For instance, The Commissioner and CREA have worked out an agreement which, if ratified by CREA membership, would definitely allow Realtors to offer no-frills MLSTM posting services. As real estate markets slow and stall, posting details on realtors.ca, an online Multiple Listing ServiceTM or MLSTM site, may not be enough to generate reasonable offers and get a property sold. In an economy when belts are tightening everywhere, a shift in the cost of services for buying or selling real estate does not seem a surprise. What is a surprise is how the real estate industry allowed consumers to undervalue services and professional expertise, and how the industry failed to adjust to internet accessibility instead of having the government bring things to a head. For instance, on CREA's site the second step for home sellers (and the fourth, for buyers) is to "find a REALTOR® who is right for you." This would indicate that there are significant steps in the buying and selling process where professional input holds no value. Since real estate and finance are not taught in school, how can consumers make truly informed decisions at any stage of the real estate continuum? Here are a few scenarios where a professional's input may be invaluable as a first step:
Discounted fees, if coupled with higher liability for consumers, may not mean improved service. During the boom, just putting your real estate up for sale with a sign or an internet posting was enough to generate offers. In post-boom markets, what else must consumers do to sell their real estate at fair market value? For instance, the main purpose in advertising listings is to raise awareness of the brokerage and bring in a pool of prospects for salespeople to work with while selling the bank of listings held by the brokerage. How will property owners handle the buyer interest that they cannot parlay into an offer to purchase? If the commission structure and service delivery model changes substantially, what will change with it?
Don't consumers deserve the same ongoing professional foresight and proactive input about the "health" of their real estate that they seek for their personal health? The industry's and professionals' continued silence on the impact to the valuable agency relationship they offer to consumers is hard to understand. If the real estate industry does not put the value of professional services and input first, is it a surprise that consumers don't? How will these special services and the related complex legal liability continue to be offered to sellers and buyers if fees are dramatically lower or services are broken down into components and rebundled into service packages? Yes, the price of services matters, but where is the benefit if real estate becomes a "buyer beware" marketplace like retail sales? Canadians can look at other countries to see how real estate and consumer protection legislation has evolved for their citizens. This transition is more complex than just repricing consumer services. The level of consumer protection available to sellers and buyers may become collateral damage in this commission battle. We will watch with interest, and continue to report on overlooked opportunities and misunderstood advantages for buyers, sellers and owners. The impact will be extreme in some markets, and almost invisible in others. Some real estate brokerages will reinvent themselves to address pricing issues; others will concentrate on added value and expanded services to fill other niches in what may become another corner of the financial services industry. For real estate professionals who performed a handful of transactions annually, this industry may lose its appeal. For those who have built service-driven careers, real estate will continue to offer rewards, just in different ways. Published: November 2, 2010 Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright laws.
|
Real Estate News Network
Today's Real Estate Outlook
Mortgage Rates
30 Year Fixed: 3.83% 15 Year Fixed: 3.05% 1 Year Adj: 2.73% (U.S. Weekly Averages) Today's Headlines 11/02/2010
Spotlight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for Agents
Readers' Choice
Our most popular recent articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||