One of the most controversial issues that face a homeowner association is tree removal. While there are many practical reasons to remove trees, some residents take a deeply personal interest in their fate. It is the Practical versus the Emotional. Let's explore the dynamics of this phenomena.
In a new homeowner association development, the developer often selects trees for visual appeal, rapid growth and ease of maintenance. The trees are young and occupy a relatively small area. Over time, these trees do what trees do, get bigger and denser. With size comes maintenance problems like:
- Tree debris that clogs the gutters
- Branches that damage roof and siding
- Branches that obscure security lighting or vision, a safety issue
- Overcrowding that promotes plant and tree diseases
- Roots in the sewer lines that causes backups and flooding
- Shading that promotes moss and algae growth
- Tree roots that lift sidewalks or crack asphalt
- Trees that block views
The cost of tree "damage control" can easily get to a point where removal may need to be considered. From a strictly dollars and cents point of view, the cost to remove a tree versus ongoing maintenance costs is a no brainer. In most cases, several hundred dollars in removal cost will often save thousands of dollars in maintenance or damage. However, the politics of removal should not be ignored.
Emotions run high about tree removal and opinions often run 180 degrees apart. A resident that complains of debris in the gutters and lobbies for removal is often countered by another that loves looking at the lush foliage. And let's face it, trees don't happen overnight. There are those that feel that killing such an enduring life form is morally wrong and that people should adapt to the changing tree environment.
An issue like this is best handled by an informed democratic process: First, hire an certified arborist to inspect and make written recommendations about the trees in question. This step is invaluable since the Board now has "expert" input into the process that often offers alternatives to removal. Second, flag trees with bright surveyor tape for easy identification.
Next, send a written notice to all owners which includes the location of the trees and the reasons for removal. It's important to include all owners because tree removal is a philosophical issue that impacts more than those in the immediate vicinity of the removals. The notice should allow at least a 30 day review period during which the Board accepts written comments before making a final decision. If there are numerous trees involved, it is prudent to hold a special owner meeting to discuss the issue. Let concerned owners vent. Remember, this is a hot topic.
Once the Board has gathered opinions, decision time is at hand. Before moving ahead, keep in mind that many cities require removal permits. Tree companies don't always comply with the law, so check with your local City Hall before proceeding. Also, a lone dissident owner or even renter may file a complaint with the City road blocking the removal process. This doesn't necessarily kill the process but will involve another level of review that will delay it. Finally, make sure all pruning alternatives have been considered. For example, view removals can often be cured by "window" pruning that can often satisfy view blockage complaints.
The politics of tree removals give the Board an opportunity to show true leadership and sensitivity. Trees are one of an HOA's most valuable assets. A good board politician will earn a vote of confidence if this issue is handled carefully.
