Access to healthcare services, restaurants, bars and coffee shops top the list of trade-offs house hunters are willing to make in order to find a home within their budget

Nearly one in every five (17.3%) house hunters are willing to sacrifice their physical safety to find a home they can afford within the next year, according to a new report from Redfin (redfin.com), the technology-powered real estate brokerage.

Nearly one in four (23.7%) Gen Z respondents said they are willing to live somewhere less safe for the right price, compared to 18.1% of millennials and 17.5% of Gen Xers. Only 5.5% of Baby Boomers said they would trade their safety. This is according to a Redfin-commissioned survey of roughly 3,000 U.S. homeowners and renters conducted by Qualtrics in February 2024.

Survey respondents indicated they are more willing to sacrifice less-vital housing needs, like the number of bedrooms, but a significant number—especially from younger generations—said they would be willing to exchange their safety for affordability.

“Younger generations have come of age during a housing supply crunch, where prices are at all-time highs. Couple that with them earning less—relative to older generations—and you can see why they are willing to make more serious sacrifices to find a home they can afford,” said Redfin Senior Economist Elijah de la Campa. “When the typical household earns less than is needed to buy or rent a typical home, house hunters can’t afford not to make sacrifices.”

Safety is a common reason why people are moving in the first place

While safety may be seen as a trade-off by some house hunters, roughly the same number of respondents (16.4%) said their concern for safety/crime was at least one of the factors driving their decision to move.

More than one in five Gen Xers (20.8%) said safety/crime was a contributing factor for their move, compared to 17.6% of boomers, 15.3% of millennials and 12.8% of Gen Zers.

Overall, safety concerns were the fourth-most cited reason for wanting to move, behind wanting more space, a lower cost of living and lower home prices—and on the same level as wanting to live near family.

More than 1 in 4 house hunters willing to trade off access to quality schools

Of the housing features presented in the survey, house hunters were most willing to trade off access to their doctor/healthcare amenities (41%), and restaurants, bars and coffee shops (36%) in their bid to secure an affordable home.

More than one in four respondents (26%) said they were willing to trade access to highly-rated schools for a home within their budget. One in three (33%) said they were willing to trade off living in an area where people looked like them, or where the local politics/government reflected their beliefs.

Inside a home, respondents prioritized the number of bedrooms (28% willing to trade off for an affordable home) over square footage (31%) and the number of bathrooms (36%).

House hunters seeking affordability are also willing to make work-related sacrifices. Around 34% said a longer commuting time was something they would consider trading for the right price, while 27% said they would be willing to entertain not having space to work from home.

More than one in four (28%) said they would be willing to live in an area with a higher risk of natural or climate disasters such as fire, flood or poor air quality, if it meant being able to afford a home.

To view the full report, including charts and additional methodology, please visit: https://www.redfin.com/news/homebuying-tradeoffs-safety-survey-2024.