Speculators Hold All the Cards

Written by Posted On Wednesday, 18 January 2006 16:00

Speculators who have been partly responsible for housing's wild ride over the last few years could be responsible for the sector's demise if they all at once decide to cash in their chips.

So far, housing is cooling off "in an orderly fashion," and David Seiders, chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders, thinks it will continue to slow at a gradual pace.

But that hasn't stopped him from warning things could turn ugly if speculators dump their holdings, or if rates spike on the so-called exotic mortgages that also have had a hand in the record number of new and resale houses.

"If you are looking for a trigger, that would be it," Seiders said at the NAHB's annual convention in Orlando earlier last week. "If there is a sudden unloading by speculators, or if interest rates go up by more than a few points, it could spark a quick reversal."

The wild card is that no one knows for certain exactly how many houses were snapped up over the last four or five years by investors looking for quick capital gains.

Estimates suggest that as many as four out of every 10 purchases in some places were by investors, some of whom Seiders believes are depending solely on appreciation to float their boats and are not even renting their units.

Other events could provoke a catastrophic spiral, too. Foreign investors could "all of a sudden" dump their investments in Treasury securities, for example. Or oil and energy prices could climb even higher.

But Seiders and other housing economists are far more worried that housing market itself could lead to its own downfall -- and possibly even that of the overall economy.

"Many people who look at risk now consider housing to be the biggest risk, not just to itself but to the entire system," the NAHB economist said. "The downside risks to the economy reside largely within the housing sector."

Seiders painted a rather scary picture of what could happen if speculators pull out of the market as quickly as they swooped in. Such a scenario could "provoke sizeable house price declines, cut into housing equity and provoke a snapback in the personal savings rate that would seriously cut consumer spending," he told the convention.

Actually, builders have been concerned about the rise in speculative buying for the better part of the last 12 months, and some have gone to great lengths to stop it.

For the most part, those who don't want investors in their communities will sell only to owner-occupants, refuse to allow sales contracts to be "flipped" to other buyers prior to closing and/or prohibit resales within the first year of ownership.

But a smaller percentage have taken even stronger steps. Some require that they be given the right of first refusal on all resales within the first 12 months of ownership. Others prohibit rentals for a year under a penalty of up to $50,000. Some limit the number of investor sales, and some go so far as to sell only one house to someone with the same last name.

Despite these precautions, however, the issue has made its way onto the list of single-family production builders' Top Ten concerns because they fear their markets could be "rocked" if prices stop rising and what they call "hidden" inventory comes back on the market all at once or too quickly.

And No. 10 on their list of worries is that rates on the unconventional forms of adjustable-rate mortgages will rise enough to force investors' hands. While they seemed to have had no qualms about Interest-only loans and pay-option ARMs when they were the seller, they are now concerned that such financing vehicles "promote investor buying instead of real home ownership."

Of course, investor activity is partly justified by the demographics. With the huge number of baby boomers, there should be -- and has been -- an increase in second home sales. But economists have been underestimating the strength of the housing market for several years, largely because of speculators.

At the 2004 builders' conclave and again at the 2005 meeting, Seiders and his counterparts at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, David Berson and Frank Nothaft, forecast that housing would trend down. But in both years, just the opposite has occurred.

Indeed, 2005 was the fifth consecutive year of records for new home sales and production. And a big part of it -- an estimated 20 percent nationally -- is because of investors and speculators.

"I can't find a year when it has been this high," Berson said at the NAHB convention. "We thought investors would pull out of the market at the beginning of last year, but they didn't start to step back until the fourth quarter."

But that in itself could be double-edged sword, and "bears some careful watching," Fannie Mae's chief economist added. "When investors stop buying, they usually start selling," he cautioned.

The markets that are said to be the most vulnerable to an investor-induced downturn are those with the highest share of such buyers.

According to Loan Performance, a San Francisco company which studies the mortgage market, the share of second home and investor purchases has been between 31 percent and 39 percent in eight metro areas -- Las Vegas, San Francisco, West Palm Beach, Phoenix, Tucson, Orlando, Honolulu and Monterey.

Other problematic markets with a 25-30 percent investor share include Miami, Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fresno, Riverside, San Diego, San Jose, Jacksonville and Santa Rosa/Vallejo.

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Realty Times

From buying and selling advice for consumers to money-making tips for Agents, our content, updated daily, has made Realty Times® a must-read, and see, for anyone involved in Real Estate.