Housing Market’s Fundamentals Have Changed. The market fundamentals that have kept property values stable through 2023 are changing. Since the beginning of 2022, as interest rates have risen, supply and demand have dropped somewhat proportionately. From a cycle-high in 2022, demand has dropped about 40%. But supply has actually dropped further—about 45%. When this happens, prices remain relatively stable while volume drops. This is exactly what we’re seeing—prices are up about 3% year over year, while volume is down 16%. In just the last few weeks, supply and demand are moving in opposite directions. One of the best leading indicators for housing supply is new listings (how many new properties are listed for sale each month). In this respect, two critical things are happening. First, new listings, which have been well below 2022 levels all year, just exceeded 2022 levels for the first time. Second, new listings typically decline seasonally toward the end of the year. But this year, that’s not happening—or at least not yet. Of course, this is a very recent trend, but this could lead to increases in inventory, days on market, and total supply, which would be very good news. Active listings (how many properties are for sale in a given week) are following a very similar pattern. Active listings have been climbing for months now and not showing any sign of seasonal declines. Of course, increasing supply doesn’t necessarily mean there will be downward pressure on pricing if demand follows the same trend. The problem is that demand is going in the other direction. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, demand continues to deteriorate and is now at the lowest point since the mid-1980s. The potential for a modest price correction in the coming months does pose a risk for investors. But it also creates opportunity! Remember that rising inventory and days on market shift the balance of power in the market. When there are more sellers than buyers, the buyers who remain have leverage and negotiating power—this is often how great deals are made.
What Can You Build On L.A.’s Steepest Narrow Lot? Who says you can’t build on a steep hill? When architect Simon Storey’s clients took him to a steep lot of undeveloped land for sale in Silver Lake, he advised them to pass. Storey’s firm, Anonymous Architects, is used to building on difficult sites, but he knew this particular lot would be especially challenging. But the lot lingered on the market for a few years and then the asking price dropped. That’s when Storey and his wife, Jen Holmes, decided they were willing to take on the difficult ground-up construction. Sloped lots typically require excavation and complicated and costly foundations, and have issues ranging from erosion to drainage to landscaping. It’s certainly not for the faint of heart. Nevertheless, Storey and Holmes bought the 2,900-square-foot lot in 2017 for $92,000 and started to plan their home. The land was not just extraordinarily steep (a grade of 33%) but also long and narrow. (For comparison, the steepest street in Los Angeles, Eldred Street in Highland Park, has the same slope.) Once again the constraints of the lot dictated the design. “We had no choice but to go right up to maximum width and stick with it for the entire building,” explains Storey. The result is a very long building that spans just 18 feet across and 100 feet long. “Every inch makes an outsize difference. I don’t think of it as being a narrow building,” says Storey. Storey wanted the house to be as utilitarian as possible. He chose a corrugated cement panel typically used for farming and industrial buildings in Europe as a siding material above the two-story concrete base. With the structure built three feet from the property line, the couple were constrained by city code in the amount of windows allowed on the side of the building. As a result, the windows are arranged in a horizontal expanse, providing panoramic views of the hills in Silver Lake and Echo Park. The entrance to the house is set back five feet, allowing double-height windows that span two stories, bringing in more light. A floating staircase makes an appearance, across from the entrance. Other expenses included $300,000 for the foundation (more than three times what it would have cost for a similarly sized project on a flat lot), and about $20,500 for geology consultants to survey the slope. All together the project came in at roughly $1.3 million.
|